SPRINGVILLE-GRIFFITH INST CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

100

25%

LEVEL 2

135

34%

LEVEL 3

100

25%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

109

27%

LEVEL 2

136

34%

LEVEL 3

101

25%

LEVEL 4

57

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

83
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

48

25%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

52

26%

LEVEL 2

72

36%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

27

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

83
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

50

23%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

148
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

99

26%

LEVEL 2

132

35%

LEVEL 3

95

25%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

7

58%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

61

18%

LEVEL 2

128

37%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

58

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

72

20%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

57

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

39

78%

LEVEL 2

7

14%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

37

73%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

45

19%

LEVEL 2

83

34%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

70

27%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

55

37%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

29

19%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

55

37%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.