TAPESTRY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

99

36%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

28

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 263

LEVEL 1

87

33%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

46

35%

LEVEL 2

46

35%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

35

28%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

25

20%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

53

37%

LEVEL 2

54

37%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

52

38%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

21

15%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

61
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

26

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

52
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

32

33%

LEVEL 3

30

31%

LEVEL 4

22

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

64

51%

LEVEL 2

52

41%

LEVEL 3

8

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

61

47%

LEVEL 2

57

44%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

11

52%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

80

34%

LEVEL 2

86

36%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

66

29%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

19

49%

LEVEL 2

14

36%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

46

38%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

20

19%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

26

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

80

52%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

14

9%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

67

42%

LEVEL 2

65

41%

LEVEL 3

24

15%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.