AMHERST CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

462
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 822

LEVEL 1

118

14%

LEVEL 2

242

29%

LEVEL 3

269

33%

LEVEL 4

193

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

449
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 843

LEVEL 1

127

15%

LEVEL 2

267

32%

LEVEL 3

218

26%

LEVEL 4

231

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

222
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

123

31%

LEVEL 3

137

35%

LEVEL 4

85

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

205
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

100

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

240
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

119

28%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

108

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

244
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 448

LEVEL 1

77

17%

LEVEL 2

127

28%

LEVEL 3

113

25%

LEVEL 4

131

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

6

17%

LEVEL 2

13

36%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

10

28%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

49
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

23

31%

LEVEL 4

26

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

40
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

9

13%

LEVEL 2

21

30%

LEVEL 3

17

24%

LEVEL 4

23

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

352
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

65

12%

LEVEL 2

145

26%

LEVEL 3

207

37%

LEVEL 4

145

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

358
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 607

LEVEL 1

72

12%

LEVEL 2

177

29%

LEVEL 3

172

28%

LEVEL 4

186

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

46

40%

LEVEL 3

24

21%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

24
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

30

31%

LEVEL 2

43

44%

LEVEL 3

15

15%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

8

24%

LEVEL 2

17

50%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

449
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 722

LEVEL 1

58

8%

LEVEL 2

215

30%

LEVEL 3

259

36%

LEVEL 4

190

26%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

442
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 749

LEVEL 1

69

9%

LEVEL 2

238

32%

LEVEL 3

215

29%

LEVEL 4

227

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

60

60%

LEVEL 2

27

27%

LEVEL 3

10

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

58

62%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

446
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 791

LEVEL 1

112

14%

LEVEL 2

233

29%

LEVEL 3

261

33%

LEVEL 4

185

23%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

433
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 793

LEVEL 1

115

15%

LEVEL 2

245

31%

LEVEL 3

211

27%

LEVEL 4

222

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

9

29%

LEVEL 3

8

26%

LEVEL 4

8

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

16
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

12

24%

LEVEL 2

22

44%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

9

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

374
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 577

LEVEL 1

54

9%

LEVEL 2

149

26%

LEVEL 3

214

37%

LEVEL 4

160

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

363
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 595

LEVEL 1

68

11%

LEVEL 2

164

28%

LEVEL 3

168

28%

LEVEL 4

195

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

64

26%

LEVEL 2

93

38%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

59

24%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.