Skip to Content
Main content

ALDEN MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

100

35%

LEVEL 3

111

39%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

55

19%

LEVEL 2

111

37%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

55

38%

LEVEL 4

21

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

53

37%

LEVEL 3

41

29%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

52

37%

LEVEL 3

56

40%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

32

21%

LEVEL 2

58

38%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

108

39%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

129
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

53

18%

LEVEL 2

107

37%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

103

42%

LEVEL 4

32

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

87

34%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

15

38%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

8

20%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

25

60%

LEVEL 2

17

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

26

13%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

83

41%

LEVEL 4

31

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

35

17%

LEVEL 2

74

35%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

12

15%

LEVEL 2

36

46%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

37

44%

LEVEL 3

19

22%

LEVEL 4

9

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.