Skip to Content
Main content

RHINEBECK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

76

20%

LEVEL 2

125

33%

LEVEL 3

122

32%

LEVEL 4

57

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

62

18%

LEVEL 2

126

36%

LEVEL 3

88

25%

LEVEL 4

70

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

32

18%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

49

28%

LEVEL 4

30

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

31

18%

LEVEL 2

59

35%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

37

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

44

21%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

73

35%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

47

26%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

4

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

4

36%

LEVEL 4

3

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

165
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

113

33%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

48

16%

LEVEL 2

105

35%

LEVEL 3

82

28%

LEVEL 4

63

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

8

33%

LEVEL 2

11

46%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

46

13%

LEVEL 2

119

35%

LEVEL 3

120

35%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

41

13%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

69

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

30

79%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

21

64%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

158
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

57

17%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

70

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

54

17%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

22

34%

LEVEL 3

17

27%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

24

33%

LEVEL 2

32

44%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

8

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.