SIDNEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

94

31%

LEVEL 3

78

26%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

101

32%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

26

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

38

25%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

37

25%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

46

32%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

49

32%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

41

27%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

55

32%

LEVEL 2

62

36%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

75%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

73

28%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

42

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

89

32%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

6

33%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

77

27%

LEVEL 2

112

39%

LEVEL 3

74

26%

LEVEL 4

26

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

29

83%

LEVEL 2

3

9%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

24

77%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

101
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

98

31%

LEVEL 2

115

37%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

27

21%

LEVEL 2

37

29%

LEVEL 3

41

32%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

51

44%

LEVEL 3

34

29%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

60

34%

LEVEL 2

57

32%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

66

33%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.