HOMER INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 335

LEVEL 1

85

25%

LEVEL 2

112

33%

LEVEL 3

81

24%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

86

26%

LEVEL 2

117

35%

LEVEL 3

70

21%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

45

28%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

69
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

75
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

57

33%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

33

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

27

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

133
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

80

25%

LEVEL 2

108

34%

LEVEL 3

80

25%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

121
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

81

26%

LEVEL 2

111

35%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

53

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

61

20%

LEVEL 2

110

36%

LEVEL 3

79

26%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

70

23%

LEVEL 2

112

36%

LEVEL 3

69

22%

LEVEL 4

59

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

24

83%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

29

16%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

57

31%

LEVEL 4

45

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

27

15%

LEVEL 2

58

31%

LEVEL 3

54

29%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

56

37%

LEVEL 2

61

40%

LEVEL 3

24

16%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

59

40%

LEVEL 2

59

40%

LEVEL 3

16

11%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.