Skip to Content
Main content

CORTLAND CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

215
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 704

LEVEL 1

265

38%

LEVEL 2

224

32%

LEVEL 3

143

20%

LEVEL 4

72

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

219
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

250

36%

LEVEL 2

223

32%

LEVEL 3

148

21%

LEVEL 4

71

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

136

39%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

71

21%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

124

36%

LEVEL 2

116

34%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

129

36%

LEVEL 2

121

34%

LEVEL 3

72

20%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

119
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

126

36%

LEVEL 2

107

30%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

37

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

11

33%

LEVEL 2

15

45%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

188
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 606

LEVEL 1

223

37%

LEVEL 2

195

32%

LEVEL 3

129

21%

LEVEL 4

59

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

200
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 598

LEVEL 1

209

35%

LEVEL 2

189

32%

LEVEL 3

138

23%

LEVEL 4

62

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

14

42%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

5

15%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

6

25%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

17

57%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

213
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 618

LEVEL 1

187

30%

LEVEL 2

218

35%

LEVEL 3

141

23%

LEVEL 4

72

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

217
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 611

LEVEL 1

178

29%

LEVEL 2

216

35%

LEVEL 3

146

24%

LEVEL 4

71

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

78

91%

LEVEL 2

6

7%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

72

89%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

71

23%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

55

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

68

23%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

194

49%

LEVEL 2

124

31%

LEVEL 3

60

15%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

182

46%

LEVEL 2

129

33%

LEVEL 3

59

15%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.