Skip to Content
Main content

MONTGOMERY C SMITH ELEMENTARY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

196

48%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

49

12%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

208

47%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

54

12%

LEVEL 4

37

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

30
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

90

47%

LEVEL 2

70

37%

LEVEL 3

23

12%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

92

45%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

26

13%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

106

49%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

26

12%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

116

48%

LEVEL 2

78

32%

LEVEL 3

28

12%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

19

53%

LEVEL 2

15

42%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

23

40%

LEVEL 2

22

38%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

23

42%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 163

LEVEL 1

58

36%

LEVEL 2

68

42%

LEVEL 3

29

18%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

73

38%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

26

14%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

62

67%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

56

64%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

34

58%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

40

52%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

144

42%

LEVEL 2

131

38%

LEVEL 3

49

14%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

150

40%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

50

13%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

52

80%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

58

77%

LEVEL 2

13

17%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

67
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

160

44%

LEVEL 2

138

38%

LEVEL 3

48

13%

LEVEL 4

19

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

166

42%

LEVEL 2

136

35%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

36

84%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

42

76%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

32

29%

LEVEL 2

52

47%

LEVEL 3

20

18%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

34

30%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

20

17%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

164

55%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

174

53%

LEVEL 2

100

30%

LEVEL 3

34

10%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.