Skip to Content
Main content

NORTHEASTERN CLINTON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

135

37%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

63

19%

LEVEL 2

133

40%

LEVEL 3

92

27%

LEVEL 4

48

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

43

23%

LEVEL 2

69

36%

LEVEL 3

57

30%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

66

39%

LEVEL 3

50

29%

LEVEL 4

23

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

65

39%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

129

38%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

131
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

61

19%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

85

27%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

6

50%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

114

39%

LEVEL 3

103

35%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

114

40%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

40

61%

LEVEL 2

21

32%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

26

52%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

68

36%

LEVEL 3

73

39%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

23

14%

LEVEL 2

61

36%

LEVEL 3

58

34%

LEVEL 4

28

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

58

33%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

40

24%

LEVEL 2

72

43%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.