Skip to Content
Main content

NORWICH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

182
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 574

LEVEL 1

201

35%

LEVEL 2

191

33%

LEVEL 3

112

20%

LEVEL 4

70

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

210
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

157

30%

LEVEL 2

158

30%

LEVEL 3

120

23%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

94

34%

LEVEL 2

99

35%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

72

28%

LEVEL 2

84

32%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

107

36%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

64

22%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

107
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

85

32%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

174

34%

LEVEL 2

176

34%

LEVEL 3

103

20%

LEVEL 4

63

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

191
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

138

29%

LEVEL 2

144

30%

LEVEL 3

106

22%

LEVEL 4

85

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

10

56%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

10

48%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

123

26%

LEVEL 2

175

37%

LEVEL 3

105

22%

LEVEL 4

70

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 420

LEVEL 1

78

19%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

115

27%

LEVEL 4

90

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

78

77%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

7

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

79

75%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

66

26%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

62

24%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

53

20%

LEVEL 2

74

27%

LEVEL 3

76

28%

LEVEL 4

68

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

135

43%

LEVEL 2

113

36%

LEVEL 3

50

16%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

104

41%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

44

17%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

182
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

199

35%

LEVEL 2

188

33%

LEVEL 3

112

20%

LEVEL 4

70

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.