UNADILLA VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

109

38%

LEVEL 2

105

37%

LEVEL 3

54

19%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

90

33%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

58

22%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

44

31%

LEVEL 2

57

41%

LEVEL 3

29

21%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

42

31%

LEVEL 2

55

41%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

65

45%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

25

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

48

36%

LEVEL 2

50

37%

LEVEL 3

31

23%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

102

37%

LEVEL 2

101

37%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

88

34%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

56

22%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

92

39%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

54

24%

LEVEL 2

97

44%

LEVEL 3

54

24%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

35

69%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

36

75%

LEVEL 2

8

17%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

39

35%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

11

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

29

31%

LEVEL 2

29

31%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

70

40%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

61

35%

LEVEL 2

76

44%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

70
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

103

37%

LEVEL 2

103

37%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

87

33%

LEVEL 2

101

39%

LEVEL 3

57

22%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.