Skip to Content
Main content

HORSEHEADS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

83

22%

LEVEL 2

146

39%

LEVEL 3

107

29%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

91

23%

LEVEL 2

162

41%

LEVEL 3

112

28%

LEVEL 4

35

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

34

20%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

44

23%

LEVEL 2

82

43%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

49

24%

LEVEL 2

78

38%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

80

38%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

6

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

71

21%

LEVEL 2

135

41%

LEVEL 3

95

29%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

150

42%

LEVEL 3

103

29%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

36

11%

LEVEL 2

138

43%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

157

44%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

47

82%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

37

84%

LEVEL 2

5

11%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

111
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

85

40%

LEVEL 3

77

36%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

38

14%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

93

35%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

61

38%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

53

40%

LEVEL 2

54

41%

LEVEL 3

19

15%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.