Skip to Content
Main content

HENDY AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

201

43%

LEVEL 2

140

30%

LEVEL 3

94

20%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

180

39%

LEVEL 2

149

32%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

55

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

101

44%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

91

41%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

30

14%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

100

43%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

55

23%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

89

38%

LEVEL 2

77

32%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

12

39%

LEVEL 2

15

48%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

22

47%

LEVEL 2

18

38%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

138

40%

LEVEL 2

100

29%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

106

33%

LEVEL 2

107

33%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

43

59%

LEVEL 2

21

29%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

45

60%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

7

9%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

154

38%

LEVEL 2

131

32%

LEVEL 3

92

23%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

143

35%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

73

18%

LEVEL 4

55

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

47

81%

LEVEL 2

9

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

37

76%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

33

19%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

64

36%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

168

59%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

148

52%

LEVEL 2

88

31%

LEVEL 3

30

10%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.