Skip to Content
Main content

FALCONER CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

84

29%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

95

30%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

33

27%

LEVEL 2

40

33%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

50

35%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

51

30%

LEVEL 2

62

37%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

52

30%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

22

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

100
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

97

35%

LEVEL 3

67

24%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

106
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

87

29%

LEVEL 2

109

36%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

59

23%

LEVEL 2

94

37%

LEVEL 3

68

27%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

76

26%

LEVEL 2

109

38%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

25

71%

LEVEL 2

8

23%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

19

73%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

50

38%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

21

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

31

19%

LEVEL 2

57

35%

LEVEL 3

47

29%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

62

39%

LEVEL 2

52

33%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

64

42%

LEVEL 2

57

37%

LEVEL 3

25

16%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.