MORAVIA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

83

26%

LEVEL 2

124

38%

LEVEL 3

81

25%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

113

32%

LEVEL 2

126

36%

LEVEL 3

68

19%

LEVEL 4

45

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

57

38%

LEVEL 3

36

24%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

49

30%

LEVEL 2

55

34%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

45

26%

LEVEL 2

67

39%

LEVEL 3

45

26%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

64

34%

LEVEL 2

71

38%

LEVEL 3

34

18%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

78

25%

LEVEL 2

118

39%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

35

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

110
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

122

37%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

42

16%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

67

23%

LEVEL 2

110

38%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

41

66%

LEVEL 2

16

26%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

46

71%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

79
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

51

32%

LEVEL 4

28

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

32

19%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

36

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

59

36%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

81

44%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.