Skip to Content
Main content

GOWANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

139

42%

LEVEL 2

119

36%

LEVEL 3

60

18%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

115
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

154

35%

LEVEL 2

167

38%

LEVEL 3

81

19%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

65

41%

LEVEL 2

56

35%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

69

35%

LEVEL 2

71

36%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

74

43%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

57
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

85

36%

LEVEL 2

96

40%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

7

23%

LEVEL 2

16

53%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

11

28%

LEVEL 2

19

48%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

52

67%

LEVEL 2

21

27%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

61

59%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

70

34%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

87
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

72

27%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

61

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

91

33%

LEVEL 2

111

41%

LEVEL 3

56

21%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

104

28%

LEVEL 2

154

42%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

48

79%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

50

76%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

41

33%

LEVEL 2

47

38%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

61

39%

LEVEL 3

40

26%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

98

47%

LEVEL 2

72

34%

LEVEL 3

29

14%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

117

42%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.