PORTVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

102

24%

LEVEL 2

153

36%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

57

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

70

16%

LEVEL 2

161

38%

LEVEL 3

111

26%

LEVEL 4

87

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

83

38%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

80

36%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

61

30%

LEVEL 2

70

34%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

81

39%

LEVEL 3

45

22%

LEVEL 4

40

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

97

24%

LEVEL 2

146

36%

LEVEL 3

106

26%

LEVEL 4

54

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

154

38%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

81

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

70

19%

LEVEL 2

144

38%

LEVEL 3

108

29%

LEVEL 4

56

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

194
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

46

12%

LEVEL 2

148

38%

LEVEL 3

108

28%

LEVEL 4

86

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

32

71%

LEVEL 2

9

20%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

24

59%

LEVEL 2

13

32%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

108
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

49

20%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

70

29%

LEVEL 4

38

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

35

14%

LEVEL 2

88

36%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

56

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

53

29%

LEVEL 2

68

38%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

78
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

35

19%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

47

25%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.