Skip to Content
Main content

CATTARAUGUS-LITTLE VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

81

25%

LEVEL 2

143

45%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

88

28%

LEVEL 2

132

42%

LEVEL 3

62

20%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

39

24%

LEVEL 2

71

44%

LEVEL 3

33

21%

LEVEL 4

17

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

68

46%

LEVEL 3

31

21%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

47
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

72

45%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

53

32%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 305

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

136

45%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

32

10%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

92
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

83

28%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

62

21%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

37

14%

LEVEL 2

130

51%

LEVEL 3

60

23%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

53

20%

LEVEL 2

116

45%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

31

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

44

69%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

35

64%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

65

43%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

19

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

24

17%

LEVEL 2

61

44%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

78

46%

LEVEL 3

31

18%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

64

36%

LEVEL 2

71

40%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.