Skip to Content
Main content

ALLEGANY-LIMESTONE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

64

29%

LEVEL 2

93

43%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

72

31%

LEVEL 2

104

44%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

25

24%

LEVEL 2

43

41%

LEVEL 3

22

21%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

34

31%

LEVEL 2

44

40%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

39

34%

LEVEL 2

50

44%

LEVEL 3

19

17%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

38

30%

LEVEL 2

60

48%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

56

28%

LEVEL 2

89

45%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

99

45%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

47

24%

LEVEL 2

87

45%

LEVEL 3

41

21%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

50

24%

LEVEL 2

100

48%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

17

74%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

22

81%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

52

40%

LEVEL 3

32

25%

LEVEL 4

17

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

34

24%

LEVEL 2

62

43%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

35

40%

LEVEL 2

41

47%

LEVEL 3

9

10%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

38

42%

LEVEL 2

42

46%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.