ELLICOTTVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

74

32%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

142
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

79

31%

LEVEL 4

63

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

15

13%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

29

25%

LEVEL 4

39

34%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

15

11%

LEVEL 2

46

34%

LEVEL 3

39

29%

LEVEL 4

35

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

40

34%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

35

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

39

33%

LEVEL 3

40

34%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

63

30%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

68

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

130
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

60

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

60%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

74

35%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

77

33%

LEVEL 4

63

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

8

47%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

7

5%

LEVEL 2

37

27%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

57

42%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

50

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

19

20%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

17

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

42

44%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.