Skip to Content
Main content

TIOUGHNIOGA RIVERSIDE ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

109

31%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

112

29%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

52

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

55

33%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

58

30%

LEVEL 2

67

34%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

60

34%

LEVEL 2

63

35%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

54

28%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

102

31%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

79

24%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

106

28%

LEVEL 2

126

34%

LEVEL 3

89

24%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

63

22%

LEVEL 2

110

38%

LEVEL 3

79

27%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

68

20%

LEVEL 2

125

38%

LEVEL 3

89

27%

LEVEL 4

50

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

46

81%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

44

79%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

50

36%

LEVEL 3

44

32%

LEVEL 4

23

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

19

14%

LEVEL 2

45

33%

LEVEL 3

40

29%

LEVEL 4

33

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

87

42%

LEVEL 2

68

33%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

93

37%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

51

20%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.