Skip to Content
Main content

MAINE-ENDWELL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

90

22%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

104

26%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

98

22%

LEVEL 2

173

39%

LEVEL 3

114

26%

LEVEL 4

59

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

37

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

94

41%

LEVEL 3

59

26%

LEVEL 4

27

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

46

24%

LEVEL 2

78

41%

LEVEL 3

45

24%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

87
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

48

22%

LEVEL 2

79

37%

LEVEL 3

55

26%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

75

21%

LEVEL 2

136

38%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

55

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

166
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

78

19%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

107

26%

LEVEL 4

59

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

130

41%

LEVEL 3

102

32%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

49

13%

LEVEL 2

148

40%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

59

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

58

67%

LEVEL 2

23

27%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

49

64%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

129
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

43

16%

LEVEL 2

100

37%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

39

14%

LEVEL 2

106

37%

LEVEL 3

91

32%

LEVEL 4

51

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

47

35%

LEVEL 2

53

40%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

10

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

59

38%

LEVEL 2

67

43%

LEVEL 3

23

15%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.