HOMER BRINK SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

70

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

58

19%

LEVEL 2

81

27%

LEVEL 3

94

31%

LEVEL 4

66

22%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

62

43%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

33

21%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

47

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

25

18%

LEVEL 2

37

26%

LEVEL 3

38

27%

LEVEL 4

40

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

4

33%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

69

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

61

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

106

43%

LEVEL 4

69

28%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

27

11%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

86

35%

LEVEL 4

66

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

25

54%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

31

60%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

78

41%

LEVEL 4

66

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

60

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

31

31%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

37

37%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

40

36%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

27

25%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.