Skip to Content
Main content

BOLIVAR-RICHBURG CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

85

34%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

91

33%

LEVEL 2

104

38%

LEVEL 3

55

20%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

39

36%

LEVEL 2

35

32%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

40

33%

LEVEL 2

50

41%

LEVEL 3

23

19%

LEVEL 4

9

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

46

33%

LEVEL 2

61

44%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

51

34%

LEVEL 2

54

36%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

83

34%

LEVEL 2

94

39%

LEVEL 3

57

23%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

88

33%

LEVEL 2

102

39%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

60

27%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

57

26%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

66

28%

LEVEL 2

97

41%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

25

83%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

25

76%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

24

25%

LEVEL 2

37

39%

LEVEL 3

25

26%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

24

24%

LEVEL 2

36

37%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

61

40%

LEVEL 2

59

38%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

67

39%

LEVEL 2

68

39%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.