ALFRED-ALMOND CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

32

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

93
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

54

24%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

52

23%

LEVEL 4

41

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

26

23%

LEVEL 2

40

35%

LEVEL 3

28

25%

LEVEL 4

19

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

44

41%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

25

22%

LEVEL 2

39

35%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

13

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

5

83%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

85
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

48

23%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

58

28%

LEVEL 4

27

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

51

24%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

36

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

32

17%

LEVEL 2

67

35%

LEVEL 3

60

32%

LEVEL 4

31

16%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

48

25%

LEVEL 4

41

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

12

34%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

21

62%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

19

15%

LEVEL 2

37

28%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

27

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

20

15%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

37

28%

LEVEL 4

31

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

32

34%

LEVEL 2

42

44%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

34

37%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.