Skip to Content
Main content

LISHA KILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

127

31%

LEVEL 3

134

33%

LEVEL 4

80

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

116

27%

LEVEL 3

159

37%

LEVEL 4

99

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

31

15%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

39

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

88

41%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

108
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

33

16%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

67

33%

LEVEL 4

41

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

6

32%

LEVEL 4

3

16%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

35
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

11

23%

LEVEL 3

17

36%

LEVEL 4

18

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

20

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

153
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

54

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

120

38%

LEVEL 4

69

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

5

20%

LEVEL 2

8

32%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

214
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

30

8%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

134

37%

LEVEL 4

80

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

159

40%

LEVEL 4

98

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

34

79%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

26

68%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

183
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

33

11%

LEVEL 2

93

30%

LEVEL 3

116

38%

LEVEL 4

67

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

133

40%

LEVEL 4

83

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

31

32%

LEVEL 2

34

35%

LEVEL 3

18

19%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.