Skip to Content
Main content

BUFFALO UNITED CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

172

39%

LEVEL 2

161

37%

LEVEL 3

78

18%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

180

41%

LEVEL 2

162

37%

LEVEL 3

59

13%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

80

37%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

89

37%

LEVEL 2

85

36%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

27

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

92

41%

LEVEL 2

84

37%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 203

LEVEL 1

91

45%

LEVEL 2

77

38%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

97
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

169

41%

LEVEL 2

150

36%

LEVEL 3

71

17%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

89
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

174

42%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

55

13%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

5

28%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

141

36%

LEVEL 2

147

38%

LEVEL 3

74

19%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

158

39%

LEVEL 2

153

38%

LEVEL 3

56

14%

LEVEL 4

39

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

31

62%

LEVEL 2

14

28%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

22

63%

LEVEL 2

9

26%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

10

29%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

7

25%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

162

40%

LEVEL 2

148

36%

LEVEL 3

68

17%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

174

42%

LEVEL 2

151

37%

LEVEL 3

52

13%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.