Skip to Content
Main content

GIRLS PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

150

40%

LEVEL 3

123

33%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

75

49%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

72
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

80

46%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

24

14%

LEVEL 2

63

36%

LEVEL 3

63

36%

LEVEL 4

26

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

22

7%

LEVEL 2

116

38%

LEVEL 3

119

39%

LEVEL 4

45

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

36

58%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

30

43%

LEVEL 2

34

49%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

50

14%

LEVEL 2

147

40%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

28

34%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

33

39%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

120

42%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.