Skip to Content
Main content

MS 324 PATRIA MIRABAL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

124

36%

LEVEL 2

126

36%

LEVEL 3

65

19%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

130

35%

LEVEL 2

162

43%

LEVEL 3

61

16%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

46
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

46

29%

LEVEL 2

67

42%

LEVEL 3

34

21%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

54

30%

LEVEL 2

83

47%

LEVEL 3

34

19%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

78

41%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

31

16%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

76

38%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

6

60%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

9

24%

LEVEL 2

18

49%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

16

41%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

80
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

110

38%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

53

18%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

110

34%

LEVEL 2

139

43%

LEVEL 3

54

17%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 277

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

106

38%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

81
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

77

26%

LEVEL 2

143

48%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

47

65%

LEVEL 2

20

28%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

53

71%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

91
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

43

19%

LEVEL 2

88

40%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

33

15%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

81
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

61

23%

LEVEL 2

119

46%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

81

64%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

69

60%

LEVEL 2

43

37%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

18

33%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

10

18%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

14

28%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

13

26%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

82
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

106

36%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

116

36%

LEVEL 2

142

44%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.