Skip to Content
Main content

PS 254 ROSA PARKS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

67

25%

LEVEL 3

90

34%

LEVEL 4

91

34%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

104

33%

LEVEL 3

98

31%

LEVEL 4

83

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

29

24%

LEVEL 3

43

36%

LEVEL 4

38

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

15

10%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

50

33%

LEVEL 4

42

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

47

32%

LEVEL 4

53

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

89
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

48

29%

LEVEL 4

41

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

18

45%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

14

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

127
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

61

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

124
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

88

37%

LEVEL 3

72

30%

LEVEL 4

52

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

157
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

57

25%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

81

36%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

23

9%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

86

32%

LEVEL 4

79

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

6

15%

LEVEL 2

10

25%

LEVEL 3

14

35%

LEVEL 4

10

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

8

17%

LEVEL 2

24

50%

LEVEL 3

12

25%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

170
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

62

25%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

88

35%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

175
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

28

9%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

93

32%

LEVEL 4

82

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

8

47%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

12

57%

LEVEL 3

5

24%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

18

47%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

15

28%

LEVEL 4

17

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

19

8%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

72

31%

LEVEL 4

84

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

149
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

86

33%

LEVEL 3

83

32%

LEVEL 4

66

25%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.