Skip to Content
Main content

TAG YOUNG SCHOLARS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

16

5%

LEVEL 3

70

22%

LEVEL 4

229

73%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

20

6%

LEVEL 3

63

19%

LEVEL 4

242

74%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

6%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

116

68%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

13

8%

LEVEL 3

36

22%

LEVEL 4

112

69%

MALE

PROFICIENT

139
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

113

78%

MALE

PROFICIENT

157
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

27

16%

LEVEL 4

130

79%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

101
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

93

92%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

120
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

107

88%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

36
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

34

92%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

35

90%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

86
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

34

35%

LEVEL 4

52

54%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

63
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

41

55%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

25

36%

LEVEL 4

41

59%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

6

8%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

42

59%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

14

5%

LEVEL 3

68

22%

LEVEL 4

227

73%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

19

6%

LEVEL 3

62

19%

LEVEL 4

239

75%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

109

78%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

122

80%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

163
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

43

25%

LEVEL 4

120

69%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

161
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

12

7%

LEVEL 3

41

24%

LEVEL 4

120

69%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.