Skip to Content
Main content

VAIL FARM ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

36

14%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

58

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

73

27%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

18

13%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

46

34%

LEVEL 4

30

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

39

30%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

33

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

28

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

22

16%

LEVEL 2

43

32%

LEVEL 3

35

26%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

118
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

30

15%

LEVEL 2

54

27%

LEVEL 3

68

34%

LEVEL 4

50

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

107
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

56

27%

LEVEL 4

51

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

11

34%

LEVEL 3

11

34%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

81

36%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

26

11%

LEVEL 2

69

30%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

65

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

9

38%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

18

55%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

61

29%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

55

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

125
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

32

14%

LEVEL 2

67

30%

LEVEL 3

63

28%

LEVEL 4

62

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

10

26%

LEVEL 2

12

31%

LEVEL 3

14

36%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

12

29%

LEVEL 2

15

36%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.