ACHIEVEMENT FIRST CROWN HEIGHTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

74

14%

LEVEL 2

207

40%

LEVEL 3

161

31%

LEVEL 4

78

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

329
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

163

30%

LEVEL 3

182

34%

LEVEL 4

147

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

136
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

112

40%

LEVEL 3

88

31%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

99

35%

LEVEL 4

72

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

103
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

95

40%

LEVEL 3

73

31%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

72

28%

LEVEL 3

83

33%

LEVEL 4

75

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

231
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 503

LEVEL 1

71

14%

LEVEL 2

201

40%

LEVEL 3

154

31%

LEVEL 4

77

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

317
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

159

31%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

142

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

231
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

52

11%

LEVEL 2

176

38%

LEVEL 3

155

34%

LEVEL 4

76

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

304
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

139

30%

LEVEL 3

163

35%

LEVEL 4

141

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

22

36%

LEVEL 2

31

51%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

25
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

21

30%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

19

27%

LEVEL 4

6

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

24

15%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

44

29%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

45

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

164
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

57

16%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

54

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

119

31%

LEVEL 3

129

34%

LEVEL 4

102

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.