Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST EAST NY CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

232
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

72

15%

LEVEL 2

163

35%

LEVEL 3

167

36%

LEVEL 4

65

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

307
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

28

6%

LEVEL 2

105

24%

LEVEL 3

164

37%

LEVEL 4

143

33%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

82

33%

LEVEL 3

94

38%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

85

35%

LEVEL 4

89

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

39

18%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

73

34%

LEVEL 4

24

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

79

41%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

193
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

66

17%

LEVEL 2

140

35%

LEVEL 3

137

34%

LEVEL 4

56

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

247
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

89

25%

LEVEL 3

128

35%

LEVEL 4

119

33%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

35
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

6

10%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

28

44%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

32

45%

LEVEL 4

22

31%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

142

34%

LEVEL 3

160

39%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

10

3%

LEVEL 2

89

23%

LEVEL 3

150

38%

LEVEL 4

141

36%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

27

49%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

18

36%

LEVEL 2

16

32%

LEVEL 3

14

28%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

14

16%

LEVEL 2

21

25%

LEVEL 3

39

46%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

23

37%

LEVEL 4

26

42%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

182
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

58

15%

LEVEL 2

142

37%

LEVEL 3

128

34%

LEVEL 4

54

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

258
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 378

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

95

25%

LEVEL 3

141

37%

LEVEL 4

117

31%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.