KIPP INFINITY CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

335
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 545

LEVEL 1

73

13%

LEVEL 2

137

25%

LEVEL 3

177

32%

LEVEL 4

158

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

389
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 544

LEVEL 1

46

8%

LEVEL 2

109

20%

LEVEL 3

170

31%

LEVEL 4

219

40%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

73

26%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

78

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

210
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

57

20%

LEVEL 3

98

34%

LEVEL 4

112

39%

MALE

PROFICIENT

161
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

64

24%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

80

30%

MALE

PROFICIENT

179
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

28

11%

LEVEL 2

52

20%

LEVEL 3

72

28%

LEVEL 4

107

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

78
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

27

18%

LEVEL 2

49

32%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

95
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

46

29%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

252
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

45

12%

LEVEL 2

86

22%

LEVEL 3

131

34%

LEVEL 4

121

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

285
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

67

18%

LEVEL 3

116

31%

LEVEL 4

169

45%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

289
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

32

8%

LEVEL 2

93

22%

LEVEL 3

147

36%

LEVEL 4

142

34%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

15

4%

LEVEL 2

64

15%

LEVEL 3

136

33%

LEVEL 4

201

48%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

46
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

41

31%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

52
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

31

24%

LEVEL 2

45

35%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

313
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

60

12%

LEVEL 2

121

24%

LEVEL 3

159

32%

LEVEL 4

154

31%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

366
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

41

8%

LEVEL 2

89

18%

LEVEL 3

152

31%

LEVEL 4

214

43%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

22
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

18

35%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

23
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

20

42%

LEVEL 3

18

38%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

15

29%

LEVEL 4

19

37%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

4

10%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

11

28%

LEVEL 4

14

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

301
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

67

14%

LEVEL 2

125

25%

LEVEL 3

162

33%

LEVEL 4

139

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

364
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

42

8%

LEVEL 2

99

20%

LEVEL 3

159

31%

LEVEL 4

205

41%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.