Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOLARS' ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

470
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

49

9%

LEVEL 3

192

37%

LEVEL 4

278

53%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

418
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 489

LEVEL 1

7

1%

LEVEL 2

64

13%

LEVEL 3

144

29%

LEVEL 4

274

56%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

279
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

26

8%

LEVEL 3

111

36%

LEVEL 4

168

55%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

253
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

33

11%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

163

56%

MALE

PROFICIENT

191
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

23

11%

LEVEL 3

81

38%

LEVEL 4

110

51%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

31

16%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

111

56%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

99
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

2%

LEVEL 3

22

22%

LEVEL 4

77

76%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

98
99%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

1%

LEVEL 3

18

18%

LEVEL 4

80

81%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

25

10%

LEVEL 3

93

38%

LEVEL 4

126

52%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

123

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

65
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

14

17%

LEVEL 3

34

42%

LEVEL 4

31

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 79

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

26

33%

LEVEL 4

31

39%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

83
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

8%

LEVEL 3

43

48%

LEVEL 4

40

44%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

60
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

2

3%

LEVEL 2

14

18%

LEVEL 3

27

36%

LEVEL 4

33

43%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

459
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

44

9%

LEVEL 3

187

37%

LEVEL 4

272

54%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

397
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

2

0%

LEVEL 2

46

10%

LEVEL 3

131

29%

LEVEL 4

266

60%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

5

11%

LEVEL 2

18

41%

LEVEL 3

13

30%

LEVEL 4

8

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

264
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

28

10%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

157

54%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

243
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

30

11%

LEVEL 3

80

29%

LEVEL 4

163

59%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

21

9%

LEVEL 3

85

37%

LEVEL 4

121

53%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

111

52%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.