Skip to Content
Main content

YOUNG WOMEN'S LRDSHP-QUEENS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

111
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

43

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

71

32%

LEVEL 4

60

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

55
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

3

4%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

28

41%

LEVEL 4

27

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

62
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

18

22%

LEVEL 3

24

29%

LEVEL 4

38

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

36
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

15

15%

LEVEL 2

52

50%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

42
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

14

15%

LEVEL 2

35

38%

LEVEL 3

29

32%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

10

36%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

67

32%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

65

31%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

60

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

110
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

23

11%

LEVEL 2

74

36%

LEVEL 3

68

33%

LEVEL 4

42

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

130
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

70

33%

LEVEL 4

60

28%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

3

7%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

9

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

16

33%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

23

13%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

34

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

47

27%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.