Skip to Content
Main content

KIPP ALBANY COMMUNITY CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 385

LEVEL 1

134

35%

LEVEL 2

167

43%

LEVEL 3

57

15%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

184

44%

LEVEL 2

168

40%

LEVEL 3

49

12%

LEVEL 4

21

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

68

33%

LEVEL 2

100

48%

LEVEL 3

28

14%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

97

43%

LEVEL 2

95

42%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

66

37%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

29

16%

LEVEL 4

16

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

87

45%

LEVEL 2

73

38%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

77
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

123

35%

LEVEL 2

155

44%

LEVEL 3

53

15%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

67
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

169

44%

LEVEL 2

152

39%

LEVEL 3

47

12%

LEVEL 4

20

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

3

13%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

10

40%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 373

LEVEL 1

125

34%

LEVEL 2

165

44%

LEVEL 3

56

15%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

9

75%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

18

38%

LEVEL 2

19

40%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

36

33%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

17

15%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

116

34%

LEVEL 2

148

44%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

148

47%

LEVEL 2

123

39%

LEVEL 3

32

10%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.