Skip to Content
Main content

DEMOCRACY PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

183
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

126

38%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

22

8%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

119

41%

LEVEL 4

57

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

44

34%

LEVEL 3

50

38%

LEVEL 4

31

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

19

10%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

74

40%

LEVEL 4

30

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

69

43%

LEVEL 4

26

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

121
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

83

36%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

108
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

72

39%

LEVEL 4

36

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

59
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

41

41%

LEVEL 4

18

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

63
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

5

5%

LEVEL 2

30

31%

LEVEL 3

44

45%

LEVEL 4

19

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

9

4%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

108

43%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

65

30%

LEVEL 3

98

45%

LEVEL 4

51

23%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

24
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

20

24%

LEVEL 2

40

48%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

18

25%

LEVEL 2

28

38%

LEVEL 3

21

29%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

173
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

117

37%

LEVEL 3

116

37%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

172
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

19

7%

LEVEL 2

85

31%

LEVEL 3

115

42%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

4

19%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

10

48%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

8

13%

LEVEL 2

16

25%

LEVEL 3

25

40%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

4

7%

LEVEL 2

25

42%

LEVEL 3

15

25%

LEVEL 4

15

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

108

40%

LEVEL 3

101

37%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

104

45%

LEVEL 4

42

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.