ACHIEVEMENT FIRST ENDEAVOR CHARTER GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

67

13%

LEVEL 2

191

37%

LEVEL 3

175

34%

LEVEL 4

84

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

43

8%

LEVEL 2

159

30%

LEVEL 3

195

37%

LEVEL 4

137

26%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

148
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

99

36%

LEVEL 3

106

38%

LEVEL 4

42

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

181
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

20

7%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

105

36%

LEVEL 4

76

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

38

16%

LEVEL 2

92

38%

LEVEL 3

69

29%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

151
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 242

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

90

37%

LEVEL 4

61

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

225
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

65

14%

LEVEL 2

174

38%

LEVEL 3

151

33%

LEVEL 4

74

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

294
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

41

9%

LEVEL 2

145

30%

LEVEL 3

174

36%

LEVEL 4

120

25%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

33
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

14

30%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

156

37%

LEVEL 3

162

39%

LEVEL 4

77

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

305
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

16

4%

LEVEL 2

121

27%

LEVEL 3

183

41%

LEVEL 4

122

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

20
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

45

45%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

13

13%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

27
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

27

29%

LEVEL 2

38

41%

LEVEL 3

12

13%

LEVEL 4

15

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

11

13%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

27

32%

LEVEL 4

17

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

76
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

43

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

215
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

56

13%

LEVEL 2

161

37%

LEVEL 3

148

34%

LEVEL 4

67

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

256
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

130

31%

LEVEL 3

162

38%

LEVEL 4

94

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.