Skip to Content
Main content

LEADERS IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 461

LEVEL 1

144

31%

LEVEL 2

197

43%

LEVEL 3

90

20%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

123

35%

LEVEL 2

139

39%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

74

31%

LEVEL 2

106

44%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

60

36%

LEVEL 2

60

36%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

60
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

70

32%

LEVEL 2

91

41%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

63

34%

LEVEL 2

79

42%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

57

31%

LEVEL 2

80

44%

LEVEL 3

37

20%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

29
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

43

34%

LEVEL 2

53

42%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

84

31%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

64
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

76

34%

LEVEL 2

82

37%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

92

24%

LEVEL 2

175

46%

LEVEL 3

85

22%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

75

27%

LEVEL 2

116

42%

LEVEL 3

61

22%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

52

64%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

48

60%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

8

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

120
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

129

29%

LEVEL 2

189

43%

LEVEL 3

90

21%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

107

33%

LEVEL 2

130

40%

LEVEL 3

67

20%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

16

59%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

15

47%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

9

27%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

129

30%

LEVEL 2

187

44%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

113

35%

LEVEL 2

127

39%

LEVEL 3

60

19%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.