Skip to Content
Main content

ACHIEVEMENT FIRST BROWNSVILLE CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

93

22%

LEVEL 2

162

38%

LEVEL 3

128

30%

LEVEL 4

46

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 526

LEVEL 1

76

14%

LEVEL 2

158

30%

LEVEL 3

161

31%

LEVEL 4

131

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

79

35%

LEVEL 3

76

33%

LEVEL 4

26

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

174
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

91

31%

LEVEL 3

95

32%

LEVEL 4

79

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

47

23%

LEVEL 2

83

41%

LEVEL 3

52

26%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 232

LEVEL 1

47

20%

LEVEL 2

67

29%

LEVEL 3

66

28%

LEVEL 4

52

22%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

160
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 387

LEVEL 1

78

20%

LEVEL 2

149

39%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

45

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

266
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 466

LEVEL 1

62

13%

LEVEL 2

138

30%

LEVEL 3

142

30%

LEVEL 4

124

27%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

63

16%

LEVEL 2

150

39%

LEVEL 3

126

33%

LEVEL 4

44

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 463

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

139

30%

LEVEL 3

149

32%

LEVEL 4

128

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

30

65%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

29

46%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

12

19%

LEVEL 4

3

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

15

22%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

7

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

12

14%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

25

29%

LEVEL 4

29

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

78

22%

LEVEL 2

137

38%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 439

LEVEL 1

64

15%

LEVEL 2

137

31%

LEVEL 3

136

31%

LEVEL 4

102

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.