BROWNSVILLE COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

58

24%

LEVEL 2

90

38%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

76

32%

LEVEL 2

103

43%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

53
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

43

35%

LEVEL 3

37

30%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

33

30%

LEVEL 2

45

41%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

37
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

32

28%

LEVEL 2

47

41%

LEVEL 3

28

24%

LEVEL 4

9

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

43

33%

LEVEL 2

58

45%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

8

6%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

62
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

39

23%

LEVEL 2

68

40%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

18

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

53

32%

LEVEL 2

74

45%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

9

22%

LEVEL 2

14

34%

LEVEL 3

13

32%

LEVEL 4

5

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

17

34%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

37

19%

LEVEL 2

74

37%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

47

25%

LEVEL 2

88

47%

LEVEL 3

42

22%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

21

54%

LEVEL 2

16

41%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

29

58%

LEVEL 2

15

30%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

89
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

56

24%

LEVEL 2

86

37%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

25

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

69

30%

LEVEL 2

100

44%

LEVEL 3

46

20%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

9

20%

LEVEL 2

20

45%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

6

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

10

30%

LEVEL 2

13

39%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

4

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

75
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

49

25%

LEVEL 2

70

36%

LEVEL 3

56

29%

LEVEL 4

19

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

66

32%

LEVEL 2

90

44%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.