Skip to Content
Main content

EXCELLENCE GIRLS CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

18

6%

LEVEL 2

59

18%

LEVEL 3

107

33%

LEVEL 4

136

43%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 412

LEVEL 1

22

5%

LEVEL 2

102

25%

LEVEL 3

142

34%

LEVEL 4

146

35%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

212
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

16

6%

LEVEL 2

50

18%

LEVEL 3

96

35%

LEVEL 4

116

42%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

246
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

16

5%

LEVEL 2

86

25%

LEVEL 3

126

36%

LEVEL 4

120

34%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

21
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

13

52%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

1

3%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

14

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

13

4%

LEVEL 2

53

18%

LEVEL 3

97

33%

LEVEL 4

130

44%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

271
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

19

5%

LEVEL 2

87

23%

LEVEL 3

131

35%

LEVEL 4

140

37%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

10

37%

LEVEL 4

6

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

3

9%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

6

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

4

5%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

28

33%

LEVEL 4

40

47%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

29

33%

LEVEL 4

41

46%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

175
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

45

19%

LEVEL 3

79

34%

LEVEL 4

96

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

218
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

113

35%

LEVEL 4

105

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.