Skip to Content
Main content

INWOOD ACAD FOR LEADERSHIP CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

195

41%

LEVEL 2

177

37%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

174

37%

LEVEL 2

197

42%

LEVEL 3

75

16%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

89

40%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

95

43%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

44
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

106

42%

LEVEL 2

103

41%

LEVEL 3

36

14%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

98

39%

LEVEL 2

102

41%

LEVEL 3

38

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

14

56%

LEVEL 2

5

20%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

90
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

178

41%

LEVEL 2

169

39%

LEVEL 3

76

17%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

163

37%

LEVEL 2

190

43%

LEVEL 3

72

16%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

111

30%

LEVEL 2

157

43%

LEVEL 3

79

22%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

91
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

104

28%

LEVEL 2

171

47%

LEVEL 3

69

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

84

76%

LEVEL 2

20

18%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

70

69%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

98
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

139

35%

LEVEL 2

162

41%

LEVEL 3

80

20%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

95
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

117

30%

LEVEL 2

176

45%

LEVEL 3

73

19%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

56

74%

LEVEL 2

15

20%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

57

71%

LEVEL 2

21

26%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

62

41%

LEVEL 2

56

37%

LEVEL 3

27

18%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

50

38%

LEVEL 2

58

44%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

133

41%

LEVEL 2

121

37%

LEVEL 3

58

18%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

124

37%

LEVEL 2

139

41%

LEVEL 3

57

17%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.