COLLABORATIVE ARTS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

39
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 429

LEVEL 1

259

60%

LEVEL 2

131

31%

LEVEL 3

32

7%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

46
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

215

56%

LEVEL 2

122

32%

LEVEL 3

36

9%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

115

55%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

96

53%

LEVEL 2

62

34%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

18
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

144

65%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

15

7%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

119

59%

LEVEL 2

60

30%

LEVEL 3

18

9%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

34
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

237

60%

LEVEL 2

121

31%

LEVEL 3

28

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

195

56%

LEVEL 2

111

32%

LEVEL 3

35

10%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

16

70%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

2

9%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

12

60%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

38
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

179

53%

LEVEL 2

122

36%

LEVEL 3

31

9%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

146

49%

LEVEL 2

104

35%

LEVEL 3

35

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

80

89%

LEVEL 2

9

10%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

69

78%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

39
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

252

60%

LEVEL 2

130

31%

LEVEL 3

32

8%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

46
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

208

56%

LEVEL 2

120

32%

LEVEL 3

36

10%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

7

78%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

77

59%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

58

57%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

9

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

182

61%

LEVEL 2

89

30%

LEVEL 3

22

7%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

157

56%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

27

10%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.