Skip to Content
Main content

ERIE COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,292
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 35,107

LEVEL 1

12,349

35%

LEVEL 2

10,466

30%

LEVEL 3

7,164

20%

LEVEL 4

5,128

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

13,291
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36,682

LEVEL 1

12,868

35%

LEVEL 2

10,523

29%

LEVEL 3

7,990

22%

LEVEL 4

5,301

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

5,968
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,003

LEVEL 1

5,710

34%

LEVEL 2

5,325

31%

LEVEL 3

3,570

21%

LEVEL 4

2,398

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

6,426
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,666

LEVEL 1

5,914

33%

LEVEL 2

5,326

30%

LEVEL 3

3,980

23%

LEVEL 4

2,446

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,324
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,104

LEVEL 1

6,639

37%

LEVEL 2

5,141

28%

LEVEL 3

3,594

20%

LEVEL 4

2,730

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

6,865
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,016

LEVEL 1

6,954

37%

LEVEL 2

5,197

27%

LEVEL 3

4,010

21%

LEVEL 4

2,855

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

375
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,090

LEVEL 1

372

34%

LEVEL 2

343

31%

LEVEL 3

216

20%

LEVEL 4

159

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

473
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,337

LEVEL 1

465

35%

LEVEL 2

399

30%

LEVEL 3

278

21%

LEVEL 4

195

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

62
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

130

42%

LEVEL 2

118

38%

LEVEL 3

46

15%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

60
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

115

42%

LEVEL 2

100

36%

LEVEL 3

42

15%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,010
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,292

LEVEL 1

706

31%

LEVEL 2

576

25%

LEVEL 3

475

21%

LEVEL 4

535

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1,092
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,416

LEVEL 1

761

31%

LEVEL 2

563

23%

LEVEL 3

546

23%

LEVEL 4

546

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,087
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 18,561

LEVEL 1

3,616

19%

LEVEL 2

5,858

32%

LEVEL 3

5,183

28%

LEVEL 4

3,904

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

9,632
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,282

LEVEL 1

3,756

19%

LEVEL 2

5,894

31%

LEVEL 3

5,653

29%

LEVEL 4

3,979

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,128
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,096

LEVEL 1

5,439

60%

LEVEL 2

2,529

28%

LEVEL 3

812

9%

LEVEL 4

316

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1,242
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,308

LEVEL 1

5,618

60%

LEVEL 2

2,448

26%

LEVEL 3

917

10%

LEVEL 4

325

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

630
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,758

LEVEL 1

2,086

56%

LEVEL 2

1,042

28%

LEVEL 3

432

11%

LEVEL 4

198

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

792
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,064

LEVEL 1

2,153

53%

LEVEL 2

1,119

28%

LEVEL 3

554

14%

LEVEL 4

238

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

11,829
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 29,337

LEVEL 1

8,222

28%

LEVEL 2

9,286

32%

LEVEL 3

6,842

23%

LEVEL 4

4,987

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

12,768
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,771

LEVEL 1

8,621

28%

LEVEL 2

9,382

30%

LEVEL 3

7,589

25%

LEVEL 4

5,179

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

463
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,770

LEVEL 1

4,127

72%

LEVEL 2

1,180

20%

LEVEL 3

322

6%

LEVEL 4

141

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

523
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 5,911

LEVEL 1

4,247

72%

LEVEL 2

1,141

19%

LEVEL 3

401

7%

LEVEL 4

122

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

12,146
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 32,485

LEVEL 1

10,360

32%

LEVEL 2

9,979

31%

LEVEL 3

7,048

22%

LEVEL 4

5,098

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

13,067
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 33,523

LEVEL 1

10,492

31%

LEVEL 2

9,964

30%

LEVEL 3

7,818

23%

LEVEL 4

5,249

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,622

LEVEL 1

1,989

76%

LEVEL 2

487

19%

LEVEL 3

116

4%

LEVEL 4

30

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

224
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,159

LEVEL 1

2,376

75%

LEVEL 2

559

18%

LEVEL 3

172

5%

LEVEL 4

52

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8,677
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,107

LEVEL 1

2,806

17%

LEVEL 2

4,624

29%

LEVEL 3

4,696

29%

LEVEL 4

3,981

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9,088
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 16,598

LEVEL 1

2,732

16%

LEVEL 2

4,778

29%

LEVEL 3

5,050

30%

LEVEL 4

4,038

24%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3,615
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 19,000

LEVEL 1

9,543

50%

LEVEL 2

5,842

31%

LEVEL 3

2,468

13%

LEVEL 4

1,147

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

4,203
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,084

LEVEL 1

10,136

50%

LEVEL 2

5,745

29%

LEVEL 3

2,940

15%

LEVEL 4

1,263

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

13,289
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 36,672

LEVEL 1

12,862

35%

LEVEL 2

10,521

29%

LEVEL 3

7,988

22%

LEVEL 4

5,301

14%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

6

60%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.