Skip to Content
Main content

NASSAU COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25,410
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,376

LEVEL 1

8,362

18%

LEVEL 2

12,604

27%

LEVEL 3

12,530

27%

LEVEL 4

12,880

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

26,234
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 46,779

LEVEL 1

8,389

18%

LEVEL 2

12,156

26%

LEVEL 3

13,511

29%

LEVEL 4

12,723

27%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12,193
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,151

LEVEL 1

3,687

17%

LEVEL 2

6,271

28%

LEVEL 3

6,237

28%

LEVEL 4

5,956

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

12,420
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,137

LEVEL 1

3,733

17%

LEVEL 2

5,984

27%

LEVEL 3

6,581

30%

LEVEL 4

5,839

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13,217
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,225

LEVEL 1

4,675

19%

LEVEL 2

6,333

26%

LEVEL 3

6,293

26%

LEVEL 4

6,924

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13,814
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 24,642

LEVEL 1

4,656

19%

LEVEL 2

6,172

25%

LEVEL 3

6,930

28%

LEVEL 4

6,884

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

467
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

65

9%

LEVEL 2

182

25%

LEVEL 3

213

30%

LEVEL 4

254

36%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

492
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 755

LEVEL 1

65

9%

LEVEL 2

198

26%

LEVEL 3

207

27%

LEVEL 4

285

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

51
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

17

18%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

30

32%

LEVEL 4

21

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

49
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

31

34%

LEVEL 3

30

33%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6,719
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 8,699

LEVEL 1

475

5%

LEVEL 2

1,505

17%

LEVEL 3

2,470

28%

LEVEL 4

4,249

49%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7,136
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 9,114

LEVEL 1

505

6%

LEVEL 2

1,473

16%

LEVEL 3

2,811

31%

LEVEL 4

4,325

47%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

11,944
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,527

LEVEL 1

1,324

8%

LEVEL 2

4,259

24%

LEVEL 3

5,828

33%

LEVEL 4

6,116

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

12,030
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,514

LEVEL 1

1,266

7%

LEVEL 2

4,218

24%

LEVEL 3

6,219

36%

LEVEL 4

5,811

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2,351
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 7,079

LEVEL 1

2,240

32%

LEVEL 2

2,488

35%

LEVEL 3

1,508

21%

LEVEL 4

843

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2,270
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 6,693

LEVEL 1

2,146

32%

LEVEL 2

2,277

34%

LEVEL 3

1,486

22%

LEVEL 4

784

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3,878
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,264

LEVEL 1

4,241

35%

LEVEL 2

4,145

34%

LEVEL 3

2,481

20%

LEVEL 4

1,397

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4,257
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 12,613

LEVEL 1

4,397

35%

LEVEL 2

3,959

31%

LEVEL 3

2,758

22%

LEVEL 4

1,499

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

24,670
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 41,891

LEVEL 1

5,924

14%

LEVEL 2

11,297

27%

LEVEL 3

12,048

29%

LEVEL 4

12,622

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25,469
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42,536

LEVEL 1

6,163

14%

LEVEL 2

10,904

26%

LEVEL 3

12,979

31%

LEVEL 4

12,490

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

740
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,485

LEVEL 1

2,438

54%

LEVEL 2

1,307

29%

LEVEL 3

482

11%

LEVEL 4

258

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

765
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,243

LEVEL 1

2,226

52%

LEVEL 2

1,252

30%

LEVEL 3

532

13%

LEVEL 4

233

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

24,977
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 42,605

LEVEL 1

6,005

14%

LEVEL 2

11,623

27%

LEVEL 3

12,248

29%

LEVEL 4

12,729

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

25,569
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 42,334

LEVEL 1

5,706

13%

LEVEL 2

11,059

26%

LEVEL 3

13,031

31%

LEVEL 4

12,538

30%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

433
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 3,771

LEVEL 1

2,357

63%

LEVEL 2

981

26%

LEVEL 3

282

7%

LEVEL 4

151

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

665
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 4,445

LEVEL 1

2,683

60%

LEVEL 2

1,097

25%

LEVEL 3

480

11%

LEVEL 4

185

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20,153
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 30,423

LEVEL 1

3,092

10%

LEVEL 2

7,178

24%

LEVEL 3

9,189

30%

LEVEL 4

10,964

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20,749
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 31,124

LEVEL 1

3,262

10%

LEVEL 2

7,113

23%

LEVEL 3

10,023

32%

LEVEL 4

10,726

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,257
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,953

LEVEL 1

5,270

33%

LEVEL 2

5,426

34%

LEVEL 3

3,341

21%

LEVEL 4

1,916

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5,485
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,655

LEVEL 1

5,127

33%

LEVEL 2

5,043

32%

LEVEL 3

3,488

22%

LEVEL 4

1,997

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.