Skip to Content
Main content

QUEENS COUNTY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52,972
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 122,840

LEVEL 1

31,121

25%

LEVEL 2

38,747

32%

LEVEL 3

26,909

22%

LEVEL 4

26,063

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54,409
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 123,590

LEVEL 1

32,736

26%

LEVEL 2

36,445

29%

LEVEL 3

27,863

23%

LEVEL 4

26,546

21%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26,037
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 59,383

LEVEL 1

14,135

24%

LEVEL 2

19,211

32%

LEVEL 3

13,392

23%

LEVEL 4

12,645

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26,728
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 59,760

LEVEL 1

14,887

25%

LEVEL 2

18,145

30%

LEVEL 3

13,642

23%

LEVEL 4

13,086

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

26,935
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 63,457

LEVEL 1

16,986

27%

LEVEL 2

19,536

31%

LEVEL 3

13,517

21%

LEVEL 4

13,418

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

27,681
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 63,830

LEVEL 1

17,849

28%

LEVEL 2

18,300

29%

LEVEL 3

14,221

22%

LEVEL 4

13,460

21%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

458
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 754

LEVEL 1

123

16%

LEVEL 2

173

23%

LEVEL 3

189

25%

LEVEL 4

269

36%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

576
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 937

LEVEL 1

159

17%

LEVEL 2

202

22%

LEVEL 3

239

26%

LEVEL 4

337

36%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

693
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 1,961

LEVEL 1

606

31%

LEVEL 2

662

34%

LEVEL 3

398

20%

LEVEL 4

295

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

786
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 2,163

LEVEL 1

696

32%

LEVEL 2

681

31%

LEVEL 3

473

22%

LEVEL 4

313

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24,047
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 35,923

LEVEL 1

3,734

10%

LEVEL 2

8,142

23%

LEVEL 3

9,414

26%

LEVEL 4

14,633

41%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24,781
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 36,716

LEVEL 1

4,051

11%

LEVEL 2

7,884

21%

LEVEL 3

9,844

27%

LEVEL 4

14,937

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,646
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,689

LEVEL 1

2,468

16%

LEVEL 2

4,575

29%

LEVEL 3

4,299

27%

LEVEL 4

4,347

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

8,699
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,409

LEVEL 1

2,540

16%

LEVEL 2

4,170

27%

LEVEL 3

4,406

29%

LEVEL 4

4,293

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4,634
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,433

LEVEL 1

9,254

43%

LEVEL 2

7,545

35%

LEVEL 3

3,176

15%

LEVEL 4

1,458

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4,689
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 20,622

LEVEL 1

9,096

44%

LEVEL 2

6,837

33%

LEVEL 3

3,218

16%

LEVEL 4

1,471

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14,494
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,080

LEVEL 1

14,936

32%

LEVEL 2

17,650

37%

LEVEL 3

9,433

20%

LEVEL 4

5,061

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14,878
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 47,743

LEVEL 1

16,194

34%

LEVEL 2

16,671

35%

LEVEL 3

9,683

20%

LEVEL 4

5,195

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49,975
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 100,634

LEVEL 1

18,512

18%

LEVEL 2

32,147

32%

LEVEL 3

24,827

25%

LEVEL 4

25,148

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51,377
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 101,853

LEVEL 1

20,102

20%

LEVEL 2

30,374

30%

LEVEL 3

25,688

25%

LEVEL 4

25,689

25%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2,997
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 22,206

LEVEL 1

12,609

57%

LEVEL 2

6,600

30%

LEVEL 3

2,082

9%

LEVEL 4

915

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3,032
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21,737

LEVEL 1

12,634

58%

LEVEL 2

6,071

28%

LEVEL 3

2,175

10%

LEVEL 4

857

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

50,461
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 107,470

LEVEL 1

23,073

21%

LEVEL 2

33,936

32%

LEVEL 3

25,201

23%

LEVEL 4

25,260

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51,253
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 106,100

LEVEL 1

23,586

22%

LEVEL 2

31,261

29%

LEVEL 3

25,724

24%

LEVEL 4

25,529

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2,511
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 15,370

LEVEL 1

8,048

52%

LEVEL 2

4,811

31%

LEVEL 3

1,708

11%

LEVEL 4

803

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3,156
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17,490

LEVEL 1

9,150

52%

LEVEL 2

5,184

30%

LEVEL 3

2,139

12%

LEVEL 4

1,017

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19,783
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 37,068

LEVEL 1

6,955

19%

LEVEL 2

10,330

28%

LEVEL 3

8,863

24%

LEVEL 4

10,920

29%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

21,019
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 38,797

LEVEL 1

7,753

20%

LEVEL 2

10,025

26%

LEVEL 3

9,610

25%

LEVEL 4

11,409

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33,189
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 85,772

LEVEL 1

24,166

28%

LEVEL 2

28,417

33%

LEVEL 3

18,046

21%

LEVEL 4

15,143

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33,390
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 84,793

LEVEL 1

24,983

29%

LEVEL 2

26,420

31%

LEVEL 3

18,253

22%

LEVEL 4

15,137

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.